Episode 37

Oral Argument: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

Case Info: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

Link to Docket: Here.

Background:

The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(2)(A)-the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense.

Question Presented: Even though Congress excluded section 3553(a)(2)(A) from section 3583(e)'s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, may a district court rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release?

Oral Advocates:

  • For Petitioners: Christian J. Grostic, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • For Respondent: Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions
SCOTUS Oral Arguments and Opinions
U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments and opinions